[Main topics] [Navigation]

Legibility

Type is legible if the glyph and word shapes are easily recognised ...

Sources
Further links

indicate English indicate German indicate French
1

legibility; legible

leserlichkeit, die; leserlich

 
2
glyph zeichenform, die  
3
serif type serifen schrift, die  
4
sans serif serifenlose schrift, die  
5
word contour wortkontur  
6
x-height minuskel-höhe, x-höhe  
7
font weight fette, die  
8
font hight versalhöhe  

legibility-badtypo.png

Examples of bad typography: Too narrow letter spacing, somewhat overlapping characters and to wide word spacing with big holes in adjusted text

legibility-good.png

Type lines with well spaced characters, some are kerned.

legibility-heavystrokes.png

Some lines of text with very thick characters

legibility-lettershapes.png

Lines of characters split into an upper part with the ascenders and a lower part with the descenders. The shapes can be recognised better in the upper part. Also sans-serif shapes are presented

legibility-limited.png

Phantasy shapes of chararacters, such as 3-D wire frames or completely distorted shapes with very variable stroke widths

legibility-restrictions.png

Shapes with very long ascenders and descenders. Other shapes with little distinctions in basic forms (a o etc.)

legibility-serif&sans.png

On the left side some lines with serif font and to the right the same text with sans-serif

legibility-serifs.png

Various forms of the character i: very bold strokes and serifs, tiny i-dots and narrow strokes

legibility-weight.png

Some forms with well weighted characters (Times, Bookman) and below two lines with very bold characters

legibility-wordshapes.png

Upper line is all uppercase. Lower line is mixed case with the bounding box showing the 'melody' of the shape

legibility-xhightexcessive.png

The words horn and norn in a font with very small ascenders. n and h are nearly the same

legibility-xhightlarge.png

Character h i with both standard ascender hight and large ascender hight

[To top/bottom of page] Sources

Swiss publication Produktion+Print, Nr. 10, Oktober 1996. Definitions according to Duden / Wahrig / Langenscheidt.

[To top/bottom of page] Further links

 

[Main topics] [Navigation]
 URL:  Created: 2003-03-11  Updated:
© Docu+Design Daube, Zürich    
  Business of Docu + Design Daube Sharing information Documentation issues Klaus Daube's personal opinions Guests on this site Home of Docu + Design Daube To main page in this category To bottom of page To top of page Search this site Site map Mail to webmaster To bottom of page To top of page